Read about Peter McCullough net worth, age, wife, children, height, family, parents, salary, and controversies as well as other information you need to know.
Introduction
Peter McCullough is an American cardiologist. He was vice chief of internal medic ine at Baylor University Medical Center and a professor at Texas A&M University. During the COVID-19 pandemic, McCullough has promoted misinformation about COVID-19, the COVID-19 vaccine, and COVID-19 treatments. He is a member of the conservative advocacy group Association of American Physicians and Surgeons.
Early life
| Name | Peter McCullough |
| Net Worth | $4 million |
| Occupation | Cardiologist |
| Age | 59 years |
| Height | 1.83m |
Peter Andrew McCullough was born on December 29, 1962 (age 59 years) in Buffalo, New York, United States. He earned a Bachelor of Science degree from Baylor University in 1984 and his Doctor of Medicine (MD) degree from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in 1988. He completed his residency in internal medicine at the University of Washington in Seattle, a cardiology fellowship in 1991, and practiced internal medicine in Grayling, Michigan, for two years before enrolling in the University of Michigan School of Public Health, earning a Master of Public Health (MPH) degree in 1994.
Career
Peter McCullough was a cardiovascular fellow at William Beaumont Hospital in the Detroit metropolitan area until 1997. He then worked successively at the Henry Ford Heart and Vascular Institute in Detroit until 2000, served as section chief of cardiology of the University of Missouri–Kansas City School of Medicine, and returned to William Beaumont Hospital where he worked from 2002 to 2010.
Check Out: Laura Ingraham net worth
McCullough spent the next four years as a chief academic and scientific officer of the St. John Providence Health System, Detroit, before joining the Baylor University Medical Center in 2014. McCullough entered into a confidential separation agreement with Baylor Scott & White Medical Center in February 2021. In July, in response to his promotion of misinformation about COVID-19, Baylor sued McCullough to stop him from associating himself with Baylor.
He is a founder and current president of the Cardio Renal Society of America and co-editor-in-chief of the society’s journal, Cardiorenal Medicine and editor of the journal Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine. He has conducted several studies on running and heart disease and co-described the term Phidippides cardiomyopathy, a heart condition found in some high-endurance athletes. Other research has included the relationship between heart disease and kidney disease and risk factors for heart disease.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Peter McCullough advocated for early treatment including hydroxychloroquine, criticized the response of the National Institutes of Health and the Food and Drug Administration, dissented from public health recommendations, and contributed to COVID-19 misinformation.
In April 2020, McCullough led a study of the medication hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19 for the Baylor Scott & White Medical Center. McCullough told The Wall Street Journal that the urgency of the public health crisis justified compromises on best practices in medical research. In July, after major studies found hydroxychloroquine was ineffective against COVID-19 and the Food and Drug Administration revoked its emergency use authorization (EUA), McCullough supported a second EUA.
Peter McCullough, Harvey Risch of the Yale School of Public Health, and co-authors published an observational study proposing an early outpatient treatment regimen for COVID-19 in August 2020 in the American Journal of Medicine. Based on previous evidence, the article made recommendations for treating ambulatory COVID-19 patients but presented no new evidence.
The article was shared on social media, mainly by groups that had previously published COVID-19 misinformation, in posts falsely interpreting the publication as an endorsement of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19. The Ministry of Health of Brazil endorsed the article on its website, contributing to a severe COVID-19 misinformation problem in Brazil. The article was criticized in letters to the editors; the editors responded that the article included some “hopeful speculations…What seemed reasonable last summer based on laboratory experiments has subsequently been shown to be untrue.”
Peter McCullough and Risch were two of three witnesses called by committee chair Senator Ron Johnson to testify before a United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs hearing on COVID-19 treatments held in November 2020. McCullough testified in support of social distancing, vaccination, and treatments, including hydroxychloroquine. Ashish Jha, dean of the Brown University School of Public Health, called to testify by the ranking member, said the “clear consensus in the medical and scientific community, based on overwhelming evidence” is that hydroxychloroquine is ineffective as a treatment for COVID-19.
McCullough said Jha was promoting misinformation and Jha’s opposition to the drug was “reckless and dangerous for the nation.” Jha responded on The New York Times opinion page, “By elevating witnesses who sound smart but endorse unfounded therapies, we risk jeopardizing a century’s work of medical progress.” Some of McCullough’s public statements contributed to the spread of COVID-19 misinformation.
He testified before a committee of the Texas Senate in March 2021, posted to YouTube by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, in which he made false claims about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines, including that people under 50 years of age and survivors do not need the vaccine and that there is no evidence of asymptomatic spread of COVID-19.
Posted on the Canadian online video-sharing platform Rumble, McCullough gave an interview in April 2021 to The New American, the magazine of the right-wing John Birch Society, in which he advanced anti-vaccination messaging, including falsely claiming tens of thousands of fatalities attributed to the COVID-19 vaccines.
In May 2021, Peter McCullough gave an interview in which he made claims about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines which were “inaccurate, misleading and/or unsupported by evidence”, including that survivors cannot be re-infected and so do not require vaccination and that the vaccines are dangerous.
Check Out: Dana Perino net worth
During television appearances, Peter McCullough has contradicted public health recommendations, including when asked about the aggressive spread of COVID-19 among children, by suggesting that healthy persons under 30 had no need for a vaccine, and when asked about the relative merits of vaccination-induced immunity versus “natural” (survivor) immunity, by disputing the necessity of vaccinations to achieve herd immunity.
Wife
Peter McCullough is married to his wife Maha Buyuk, they had their wedding in 1988. His wife was born in Jerusalem and is a Palestinian Christian. The couple first met in 1984. Peter McCullough stands at an appealing height of 1.83m and has a good body weight which suits his personality. As of mid-2022, Peter McCullough and his wife Maha Buyuk are still married but haven’t disclosed information related to their children.
Peter McCullough net worth
How much is Peter McCullough worth? Peter McCullough net worth is estimated at around $4 million. His main source of income is from his primary work as a cardiologist. Peter McCullough’s salary per month and other career earnings are over $400,000 dollars annually. His remarkable achievements have earned him some luxurious lifestyles and some fancy car trips. He is one of the richest and most influential cardiologists in the United States.